Meanwhile, the president doesn`t have much power or leverage. The Chair is limited and can do nothing to speed up or slow down the process until the amendment session is over and the votes are counted. If something is proposed and passed before it is incorporated into the law or added (amended), the president has the power to intervene and possibly prevent changes to the Constitution. It turned out that two of these amendments were rejected, but ten were ratified shortly after the adoption of the Constitution (the Bill of Rights). As a result, article 5 was created to allow for the adoption of constitutional amendments. However, the amendment process is not too strict to allow for a constitutional amendment. It is true that the process requires that amendments be supported by consensus. But there are strong reasons to demand such support, such as preventing constitutional provisions that are strongly opposed by a significant minority in the country, which would undermine the nation`s loyalty to the Constitution. See John O. McGinnis and Michael B. Rappaport, Originalism and the Good Constitution (2013). If Congress believes that changes should be made to the Constitution, at least 2/3 of the House of Representatives and the Senate must propose this amendment to the Constitution. This alone does not mean that an amendment is made or an amendment is added, it simply allows one to fall within the scope where a proposed amendment is considered and voted on later to decide what changes (if any) will be made to the Constitution.
(1) Changes that occur even if there is no change. Long after the country was founded, the federal government did little. State governments were much more important. That has changed. Today, federal law affects every aspect of our lives. But you cannot attribute this change to a constitutional amendment. Some would argue that the Constitution has given the federal government the opportunity to play this important role from the beginning; The German government simply opposed it. Others might say that the federal government should not be so powerful. But there is no denying that this huge change has taken place in our system, and there is no change that has caused it. The Washington Declaration has become controversial, and academics disagree on whether it still describes the appropriate constitutional order in the United States.  Scholars [which ones?] who reject Washington`s position often argue that the Constitution itself was passed without following the procedures of the Articles of Confederation, while Constitutional Attorney Michael Farris disagrees, arguing that the Convention was the product of the remaining power of the states and that the change in the adoption process was legal after receiving unanimous approval from state legislators.  Article 5 Summary: Constitutional AmendmentsDefinition and Summary: Section 5 of the U.S.
Constitution states that constitutional amendments must be adopted by a two-thirds majority in both houses of the Legislature (upper and lower House of the Senate). The amendment must then be ratified by three-quarters of the states. and then States. Alternative methods are also provided, but these are rarely used. These two things – how difficult it is to change the Constitution and how many changes happen without amendments – are the opposite sides of the same coin. Since it is so difficult to edit the text, we have found other ways to make the kind of changes you can expect from editing the text. A nation, like other living beings, must adapt if it is to survive. If a means of adaptation is closed, he must find another way. That is what the American constitutional system has done. Our constitutional system – our current system, in the way it actually works, as opposed to what is written on paper – is changed by Congress, the president, the courts, and often only by changing understandings between people, even if the text remains the same. Specifically, I think these four things are true: (1) There have been significant changes in the fundamental nature of our government that have taken place without amending the written constitution. (2) Several changes that seemed to change things were added to the Constitution after the change had already taken place in most of the country.
The change did not cause the change; he has just confirmed that. (3) On a few occasions, a proposal for a constitutional amendment was rejected – and things changed anyway, in the same way that the amendment would have changed them. The amendment was formally rejected – it is not in the text of the Constitution – but in practice it could just as easily have been adopted. (4) Some amendments added to the text tried but failed to change matters when they were adopted; But many years later, when the country was ready, it changed the way the change had been called long before. The article further breaks down how the article allows Congress to make amendments to the Constitution and what conditions must be in place for those amendments to be made and ultimately accepted for incorporation into the Constitution. .